Not-for-profit organizations face a special challenge: optimizing extremely limited resources even in the best conditions.
The COVID-19 pandemic shifted the perspective of many people on work-life balance. According to a McKinsey & Company analysis, the health care and social assistance sector has a 20%-29% potential share of time to spend working remotely in the United States without a loss of productivity.
That rate reaches 33%-69% for the education sector, and 31%-42% for the government and administrative support sector. Flexible workspaces continually grow more appealing, so organizations will need to adjust practices and processes to accommodate the new working environment.
Now that workers expect a remote working option, think about how to strengthen your internal control environment to continue productive, accurate, and timely work.
What Are Internal Controls?
To identify best practices for strengthening internal controls in a hybrid workplace, it’s important to make the distinction between a process and a control.
A process completes or performs specific functions or procedures, while a control prevents a process from operating improperly or detects when it fails.
Controls minimize errors and ensure that the process runs right. An internal control can be a combination of people, processes, and systems; a deficiency in any area can lead to weaknesses.
In a remote working environment, not-for-profit organizations may need to pivot these processes and controls in some way to maintain their efficacy.
What Is a Hybrid Workplace?
A hybrid workplace is a developing norm that combines in-office and remote work, letting employees manage their own workflow while having opportunities for in-person collaboration. Google, Amazon, and Facebook have adopted policies offering some form of hybrid or remote work to employees.
For a more detailed perspective on the pros and cons of the hybrid workplace model, please read our article.
How Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Change Occurrences of Fraud?
As a result of the declaration of emergency, many organizations went remote quickly and adapted their current controls and processes for a remote setting. In many cases, they couldn’t revise policies fast enough to adapt.
It’s a good time to review and revise policies and procedures, considering criteria for onsite and remote operations. In many cases, limited human resources constrain organizations regardless of increasing demand in productivity.
Ensuring maintenance of segregation of duties and new software implementation, where feasible, can increase productivity and controls even in these challenging times.
A record number of employees now work remotely or onsite part time, which makes them more reliant on virtual private networks (VPNs). This exposes normally onsite devices outside the workplace environment to the internet’s inherent threats.
The likelihood of a malicious cyberattack during a major disruptive event like the COVID-19 pandemic increased given both recent ransomware and distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) trends and the increased exposure of systems while employees work remotely.
These attacks have greater impact because response and recovery time tends to lag when employees work across multiple locations—and organizations rely more on IT systems.
Many organizations still depended on physical access to fix configuration issues as well, so quarantine or shelter-in-place policies limiting IT teams’ access to servers and network devices further delayed incident response and troubleshooting efforts.
For more information on how to identify potential cyberthreats, please see our article.